Fracture and Structural Integrity e-ISSN 1971-8993 Open access
Analytical, Numerical and Physical Models Vol. 17, No. 63 (2023)

Numerical analysis of repaired wall loss defect pipelines for optimum composite wrap thickness

Author and affiliation details
  • Muhammed Khaise National Institute of Technology Calicut, 673601, India
  • Silvio de Barros CESI LINEACT, Saint-Nazaire, France
  • Ney Rohem Instituto Federal Fluminense, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • Maria Banea Federal Center of Technological Education (CEFET/RJ), Rio de Janeiro, 20271-110, Brazil
  • Sandip Budhe Corresponding author National Institute of Technology Calicut, 673601, India ORCID iD0000-0002-3235-9232 sandipiit@gmail.com
DOI
10.3221/IGF-ESIS.63.14
Pages
153-168
Published
Licence
CC BY 4.0

Abstract

The paper presents the numerical analysis of failure pressure of wall loss defect metallic pipelines and validate it with experimental results. An optimization of composite thickness for repair of wall loss defect pipeline is also carried out using numerical analysis. A nonlinear explicit FE code with constitutive models for metallic steel and composite material to failure modelling was used. Three different cases: non-defective pipe, wall loss defective pipe and composite repaired of defective pipe are considered. It was found that the numerical results are in good agreement with the analytical results in all the three cases. The theoretical failure pressure determined by ISO/TS 24817 standard for wall loss defect pipe is highly conservative compared to the numerical failure pressure for the given composite repair thickness. Additionally, the numerical study on optimization of repair thickness revealed that lower composite repair thickness can also sustain the designed failure pressure (composite repair thickness of 8.4 mm can sustain the same designed pressure instead of 16.1 mm thickness), which implies there is scope to further reduce the composite thickness, which ultimately reduce the repair cost.

Keywords

Article history

  1. ReceivedUntil the next stage: 82 days
  2. RevisedUntil the next stage: 0 days
  3. AcceptedUntil the next stage: 68 days
  4. Published

How to cite

APA

Khaise, M., de Barros, S., Rohem, N., Banea, M., & Budhe, S. (2022). Numerical analysis of repaired wall loss defect pipelines for optimum composite wrap thickness. Fracture and Structural Integrity, 17(63), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.63.14

IEEE

M. Khaise, S. de Barros, N. Rohem, M. Banea, and S. Budhe, “Numerical analysis of repaired wall loss defect pipelines for optimum composite wrap thickness,” Fracture and Structural Integrity, vol. 17, no. 63, pp. 153–168, 2022, doi: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.63.14.

MLA

Khaise, Muhammed, et al. “Numerical analysis of repaired wall loss defect pipelines for optimum composite wrap thickness.” Fracture and Structural Integrity, vol. 17, no. 63, 2022, pp. 153–168. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.63.14.

Chicago

Khaise, Muhammed, Silvio de Barros, Ney Rohem, Maria Banea, and Sandip Budhe. 2022. “Numerical analysis of repaired wall loss defect pipelines for optimum composite wrap thickness.” Fracture and Structural Integrity 17 (63): 153–168. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.63.14.

Harvard

Khaise, M., de Barros, S., Rohem, N., Banea, M. and Budhe, S. (2022) ‘Numerical analysis of repaired wall loss defect pipelines for optimum composite wrap thickness’, Fracture and Structural Integrity, 17(63), pp. 153–168. doi: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.63.14.

Vancouver

Khaise M, de Barros S, Rohem N, Banea M, Budhe S. Numerical analysis of repaired wall loss defect pipelines for optimum composite wrap thickness. Fracture and Structural Integrity. 2022;17(63):153-168. doi:10.3221/IGF-ESIS.63.14

BibTeX

@article{khaise2022, author = {Khaise, Muhammed and de Barros, Silvio and Rohem, Ney and Banea, Maria and Budhe, Sandip}, title = {Numerical analysis of repaired wall loss defect pipelines for optimum composite wrap thickness}, journal = {Fracture and Structural Integrity}, year = {2022}, volume = {17}, number = {63}, pages = {153--168}, doi = {10.3221/IGF-ESIS.63.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.63.14}, issn = {1971-8993} }

RIS

TY - JOUR AU - Khaise, Muhammed AU - de Barros, Silvio AU - Rohem, Ney AU - Banea, Maria AU - Budhe, Sandip TI - Numerical analysis of repaired wall loss defect pipelines for optimum composite wrap thickness JO - Fracture and Structural Integrity T2 - Fracture and Structural Integrity PY - 2022 DA - 2022/12/21 VL - 17 IS - 63 SP - 153 EP - 168 DO - 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.63.14 UR - https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.63.14 SN - 1971-8993 ER -

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

May be shared and adapted, provided appropriate credit is given. Copyright © 2022 Muhammed Khaise, Silvio de Barros, Ney Rohem, Maria Banea, Sandip Budhe.

Copyright 
Authors are allowed to retain both the copyright and the publishing rights of their articles without restrictions.  

Open Access Statement

Fracture and Structural Integrity (F&SI) is an open-access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the DOAI definition of open access.

F&SI operates under the Creative Commons Licence Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0). This allows to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, to remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, but giving appropriate credit, providing a link to the license, and indicating if changes were made.

Similar articles