Fracture and Structural Integrity e-ISSN 1971-8993 Open access
Failure Analysis, Case Studies and Forensic Engineering Vol. 14, No. 52 (2020)

Prediction of the burst pressure for defective pipelines using different semi-empirical models

Author and affiliation details
  • Sandip Budhe Corresponding author Federal Center of Technological Education in Rio de Janeiro – CEFET/RJ, Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil ORCID iD0000-0002-3235-9232 sandipiit@gmail.com
  • S. de Barros Federal Center of Technological Education in Rio de Janeiro – CEFET/RJ, Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil ORCID iD0000-0002-2520-569X
  • M. D. Banea Federal Center of Technological Education in Rio de Janeiro – CEFET/RJ, Rio de Janeiro/RJ, Brazil Université de Nantes, Institut de Recherche en Génie Civil et Mécanique, Saint-Nazaire, France ORCID iD0000-0002-8378-2292
DOI
10.3221/IGF-ESIS.52.12
Pages
137-147
Published

Abstract

The main aim of this work is to predict the theoretical burst pressure of defective pipelines using different semi-empirical models and compare them with the results of the hydrostatic tests. A methodology was formulated with accounting for a minimum thickness (weakest section of the pipe) over the length of the pipe to predict the most conservative burst pressure. With a simple analytical expression, a reasonable accuracy and more conservative burst pressure can be obtained for any arbitrary defect shapes. A variation of burst pressure was found between theoretical prediction and hydrostatic burst test results with respect to the different semi-empirical models even for the same corroded defects. Different defect geometry shapes and pipe material conditions are the possible causes for variation in the burst pressure between the semi-empirical models, so a careful selection of these parameters is necessary. The proposed methodology predicted a more conservative burst pressure for all arbitrary defects shapes and can predict reasonably accurate values if it accounts for the axial stress.

Keywords

Article history

  1. ReceivedUntil the next stage: 12 days
  2. Revision requestedUntil the next stage: 49 days
  3. RevisedUntil the next stage: 0 days
  4. AcceptedUntil the next stage: 32 days
  5. Published

How to cite

APA

Budhe, S., de Barros, S., & Banea, M. D. (2020). Prediction of the burst pressure for defective pipelines using different semi-empirical models. Fracture and Structural Integrity, 14(52), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.52.12

IEEE

S. Budhe, S. de Barros, and M. D. Banea, “Prediction of the burst pressure for defective pipelines using different semi-empirical models,” Fracture and Structural Integrity, vol. 14, no. 52, pp. 137–147, 2020, doi: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.52.12.

MLA

Budhe, Sandip, et al. “Prediction of the burst pressure for defective pipelines using different semi-empirical models.” Fracture and Structural Integrity, vol. 14, no. 52, 2020, pp. 137–147. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.52.12.

Chicago

Budhe, Sandip, S. de Barros, and M. D. Banea. 2020. “Prediction of the burst pressure for defective pipelines using different semi-empirical models.” Fracture and Structural Integrity 14 (52): 137–147. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.52.12.

Harvard

Budhe, S., de Barros, S. and Banea, M.D. (2020) ‘Prediction of the burst pressure for defective pipelines using different semi-empirical models’, Fracture and Structural Integrity, 14(52), pp. 137–147. doi: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.52.12.

Vancouver

Budhe S, de Barros S, Banea MD. Prediction of the burst pressure for defective pipelines using different semi-empirical models. Fracture and Structural Integrity. 2020;14(52):137-147. doi:10.3221/IGF-ESIS.52.12

BibTeX

@article{budhe2020, author = {Budhe, Sandip and de Barros, S. and Banea, M. D.}, title = {Prediction of the burst pressure for defective pipelines using different semi-empirical models}, journal = {Fracture and Structural Integrity}, year = {2020}, volume = {14}, number = {52}, pages = {137--147}, doi = {10.3221/IGF-ESIS.52.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.52.12}, issn = {1971-8993} }

RIS

TY - JOUR AU - Budhe, Sandip AU - de Barros, S. AU - Banea, M. D. TI - Prediction of the burst pressure for defective pipelines using different semi-empirical models JO - Fracture and Structural Integrity T2 - Fracture and Structural Integrity PY - 2020 DA - 2020/02/29 VL - 14 IS - 52 SP - 137 EP - 147 DO - 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.52.12 UR - https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.52.12 SN - 1971-8993 ER -

Licence

Copyright © 2020 Sandip Budhe, S. de Barros, M. D. Banea.

Copyright 
Authors are allowed to retain both the copyright and the publishing rights of their articles without restrictions.  

Open Access Statement

Fracture and Structural Integrity (F&SI) is an open-access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the DOAI definition of open access.

F&SI operates under the Creative Commons Licence Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0). This allows to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, to remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, but giving appropriate credit, providing a link to the license, and indicating if changes were made.

Similar articles