Fracture and Structural Integrity e-ISSN 1971-8993 Open access
SI: Failure Analysis of Materials and Structures Vol. 16, No. 61 (2022)

Acoustic Analysis Using Symmetrised Implicit Midpoint Rule

Author and affiliation details
  • Noorhelyna Razali Corresponding author Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia ORCID iD0000-0001-9333-3012 helyna@ukm.edu.my
  • Nisa Balqis Masnoor Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia ORCID iD0000-0002-4869-4289
  • Shahrum Abdullah Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Muhammad Faiz Hilmi Mohd Zainaphi Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing, Faculty of Engineering and Built Environment, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
DOI
10.3221/IGF-ESIS.61.14
Pages
214-229
Published
Licence
CC BY 4.0

Abstract

In wave propagation phenomena, time-advancing numerical methods must accurately represent the amplitude and phase of the propagating waves. The acoustic waves are non-dispersive and non-dissipative. However, the standard schemes both retain dissipation and dispersion errors. Thus, this paper aims to analyse the dissipation, dispersion, accuracy, and stability of the Runge–Kutta method and derive a new scheme and algorithm that preserves the symmetry property. The symmetrised method is introduced in the time-of-finite-difference method  for solving problems in aeroacoustics. More efficient programming for solving acoustic problems in time and space, i.e. the IMR method for solving acoustic problems, an advection equation, compares the square-wave and step-wave Lax methods with symmetrised IMR (one-and two-step active). The results of conventional methods are usually unstable for hyperbolic problems. The forward time central space square equation is an unstable method with minimal usefulness, which can only study waves for short fractions of one oscillation period. Therefore, nonlinear instability and shock formation are controlled by numerical viscosities such as those discussed with the Lax method equation. The one- and two-step active symmetrised IMR methods are more efficient than the wave method.

Keywords

Article history

  1. ReceivedUntil the next stage: 74 days
  2. RevisedUntil the next stage: 1 day
  3. AcceptedUntil the next stage: 50 days
  4. Published

Statements

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education

How to cite

APA

Razali, N., Masnoor, N. B., Abdullah, S., & Mohd Zainaphi, M. F. H. (2022). Acoustic Analysis Using Symmetrised Implicit Midpoint Rule. Fracture and Structural Integrity, 16(61), 214–229. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.61.14

IEEE

N. Razali, N. B. Masnoor, S. Abdullah, and M. F. H. Mohd Zainaphi, “Acoustic Analysis Using Symmetrised Implicit Midpoint Rule,” Fracture and Structural Integrity, vol. 16, no. 61, pp. 214–229, 2022, doi: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.61.14.

MLA

Razali, Noorhelyna, et al. “Acoustic Analysis Using Symmetrised Implicit Midpoint Rule.” Fracture and Structural Integrity, vol. 16, no. 61, 2022, pp. 214–229. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.61.14.

Chicago

Razali, Noorhelyna, Nisa Balqis Masnoor, Shahrum Abdullah, and Muhammad Faiz Hilmi Mohd Zainaphi. 2022. “Acoustic Analysis Using Symmetrised Implicit Midpoint Rule.” Fracture and Structural Integrity 16 (61): 214–229. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.61.14.

Harvard

Razali, N., Masnoor, N.B., Abdullah, S. and Mohd Zainaphi, M.F.H. (2022) ‘Acoustic Analysis Using Symmetrised Implicit Midpoint Rule’, Fracture and Structural Integrity, 16(61), pp. 214–229. doi: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.61.14.

Vancouver

Razali N, Masnoor NB, Abdullah S, Mohd Zainaphi MFH. Acoustic Analysis Using Symmetrised Implicit Midpoint Rule. Fracture and Structural Integrity. 2022;16(61):214-229. doi:10.3221/IGF-ESIS.61.14

BibTeX

@article{razali2022, author = {Razali, Noorhelyna and Masnoor, Nisa Balqis and Abdullah, Shahrum and Mohd Zainaphi, Muhammad Faiz Hilmi}, title = {Acoustic Analysis Using Symmetrised Implicit Midpoint Rule}, journal = {Fracture and Structural Integrity}, year = {2022}, volume = {16}, number = {61}, pages = {214--229}, doi = {10.3221/IGF-ESIS.61.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.61.14}, issn = {1971-8993} }

RIS

TY - JOUR AU - Razali, Noorhelyna AU - Masnoor, Nisa Balqis AU - Abdullah, Shahrum AU - Mohd Zainaphi, Muhammad Faiz Hilmi TI - Acoustic Analysis Using Symmetrised Implicit Midpoint Rule JO - Fracture and Structural Integrity T2 - Fracture and Structural Integrity PY - 2022 DA - 2022/06/19 VL - 16 IS - 61 SP - 214 EP - 229 DO - 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.61.14 UR - https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.61.14 SN - 1971-8993 ER -

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

May be shared and adapted, provided appropriate credit is given. Copyright © 2022 Noorhelyna Razali, Nisa Balqis Masnoor, Shahrum Abdullah, Muhammad Faiz Hilmi Mohd Zainaphi.

Copyright 
Authors are allowed to retain both the copyright and the publishing rights of their articles without restrictions.  

Open Access Statement

Fracture and Structural Integrity (F&SI) is an open-access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the DOAI definition of open access.

F&SI operates under the Creative Commons Licence Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0). This allows to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, to remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, but giving appropriate credit, providing a link to the license, and indicating if changes were made.

Similar articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)