Fracture and Structural Integrity e-ISSN 1971-8993 Open access
Integrity of materials and structures Vol. 19, No. 74 (2025)

An experimental study on the rehabilitation performance of CFRP-strengthened bubble deck slabs: effects of void size and preloading levels

Author and affiliation details
  • Abdulkhalik Abdulridha Corresponding author Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Jadriya, Baghdad, Iraq abdulkalikjabbar@yahoo.com
  • Muntadher Bader Department of Civil Engineering, College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Jadriya, Baghdad, Iraq
DOI
10.3221/IGF-ESIS.74.08
Pages
115-128
Published
Licence
CC BY 4.0

Abstract

This study examines the rehabilitation performance of reinforced concrete bubble deck slabs (with 50 mm and 60 mm voids) strengthened with externally bonded CFRP sheets. Nine specimens were tested: eight bubble slabs (grouped by void size and preloading level) and one solid control slab. Three specimens of each void size were pre-damaged to 50%, 60%, and 75% of their ultimate load before being strengthened with CFRP and retested. One specimen per group remained unstrengthened for comparison. Results show that increasing void size reduces load capacity: the unstrengthened 50 mm and 60 mm void slabs achieved 96.2% and 86.5% of the solid slab’s strength, respectively. CFRP rehabilitation effectively restored structural performance, with 50 mm void slabs recovering up to 98.5% of the control slab’s capacity and exhibiting 25% lower deflection. In contrast, 60 mm void slabs showed lower recovery efficiency, particularly at higher preloading levels SB-6-75 recovered only 82.5% of the control strength. All strengthened specimens failed by CFRP debonding combined with flexural cracking, with no shear failures observed. The study demonstrates that CFRP retrofitting significantly enhances the strength and stiffness of damaged bubble deck slabs, especially those with smaller voids. Void size and pre-damage level are critical factors influencing rehabilitation success.

Keywords

Article history

  1. ReceivedUntil the next stage: 10 days
  2. RevisedUntil the next stage: 9 days
  3. AcceptedUntil the next stage: 0 days
  4. Published

How to cite

APA

Abdulridha, A., & Bader, M. (2025). An experimental study on the rehabilitation performance of CFRP-strengthened bubble deck slabs: effects of void size and preloading levels. Fracture and Structural Integrity, 19(74), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.74.08

IEEE

A. Abdulridha and M. Bader, “An experimental study on the rehabilitation performance of CFRP-strengthened bubble deck slabs: effects of void size and preloading levels,” Fracture and Structural Integrity, vol. 19, no. 74, pp. 115–128, 2025, doi: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.74.08.

MLA

Abdulridha, Abdulkhalik, and Muntadher Bader. “An experimental study on the rehabilitation performance of CFRP-strengthened bubble deck slabs: effects of void size and preloading levels.” Fracture and Structural Integrity, vol. 19, no. 74, 2025, pp. 115–128. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.74.08.

Chicago

Abdulridha, Abdulkhalik, and Muntadher Bader. 2025. “An experimental study on the rehabilitation performance of CFRP-strengthened bubble deck slabs: effects of void size and preloading levels.” Fracture and Structural Integrity 19 (74): 115–128. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.74.08.

Harvard

Abdulridha, A. and Bader, M. (2025) ‘An experimental study on the rehabilitation performance of CFRP-strengthened bubble deck slabs: effects of void size and preloading levels’, Fracture and Structural Integrity, 19(74), pp. 115–128. doi: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.74.08.

Vancouver

Abdulridha A, Bader M. An experimental study on the rehabilitation performance of CFRP-strengthened bubble deck slabs: effects of void size and preloading levels. Fracture and Structural Integrity. 2025;19(74):115-128. doi:10.3221/IGF-ESIS.74.08

BibTeX

@article{abdulridha2025, author = {Abdulridha, Abdulkhalik and Bader, Muntadher}, title = {An experimental study on the rehabilitation performance of CFRP-strengthened bubble deck slabs: effects of void size and preloading levels}, journal = {Fracture and Structural Integrity}, year = {2025}, volume = {19}, number = {74}, pages = {115--128}, doi = {10.3221/IGF-ESIS.74.08}, url = {https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.74.08}, issn = {1971-8993} }

RIS

TY - JOUR AU - Abdulridha, Abdulkhalik AU - Bader, Muntadher TI - An experimental study on the rehabilitation performance of CFRP-strengthened bubble deck slabs: effects of void size and preloading levels JO - Fracture and Structural Integrity T2 - Fracture and Structural Integrity PY - 2025 DA - 2025/08/16 VL - 19 IS - 74 SP - 115 EP - 128 DO - 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.74.08 UR - https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.74.08 SN - 1971-8993 ER -

Licence

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International

May be shared and adapted, provided appropriate credit is given. Copyright © 2025 Abdulkhalik Abdulridha, Muntadher Bader.

Copyright 
Authors are allowed to retain both the copyright and the publishing rights of their articles without restrictions.  

Open Access Statement

Fracture and Structural Integrity (F&SI) is an open-access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the DOAI definition of open access.

F&SI operates under the Creative Commons Licence Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0). This allows to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, to remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, but giving appropriate credit, providing a link to the license, and indicating if changes were made.

Similar articles