Fracture and Structural Integrity e-ISSN 1971-8993 Open access
Miscellanea Vol. 7, No. 26 (2013)

Comparison between dog-bone and Gaussian specimens for size effect evaluation in gigacycle fatigue

Author and affiliation details
DOI
10.3221/IGF-ESIS.26.06
Pages
Pages 49-56
Published
Published inVol. 7, No. 26 (2013)Go to the issue

Abstract

Gigacycle fatigue properties of materials are strongly affected by the specimen risk volume (volume
of material subjected to a stress amplitude larger than the 90% of the maximum stress). Gigacycle fatigue tests,
performed with ultrasonic fatigue testing machines, are commonly carried out by using hourglass shaped
specimens with a small risk volume. The adoption of traditional dog-bone specimens allows for increasing the
risk volume, even if the increment is quite limited. In order to obtain larger risk volumes, a new specimen shape
is proposed (Gaussian specimen). The dog-bone and the Gaussian specimens are compared through Finite
Element Analyses and the numerical results are validated experimentally by means of strain gages
measurements. The range of applicability of the two different specimens in terms of available risk volume and
stress concentration effects due to the cross section variation is determined.

Keywords

Article history

  1. ReceivedUntil the next stage: 0 days
  2. AcceptedUntil the next stage: 0 days
  3. Published

How to cite

APA

Tridello, A., Paolino, D., Chiandussi, G., & Rossetto, M. (2013). Comparison between dog-bone and Gaussian specimens for size effect evaluation in gigacycle fatigue. Fracture and Structural Integrity, 7(26), Pages 49–56. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.26.06

IEEE

A. Tridello, D. Paolino, G. Chiandussi, and M. Rossetto, “Comparison between dog-bone and Gaussian specimens for size effect evaluation in gigacycle fatigue,” Fracture and Structural Integrity, vol. 7, no. 26, pp. Pages 49–56, 2013, doi: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.26.06.

MLA

Tridello, A., et al. “Comparison between dog-bone and Gaussian specimens for size effect evaluation in gigacycle fatigue.” Fracture and Structural Integrity, vol. 7, no. 26, 2013, pp. Pages 49–56. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.26.06.

Chicago

Tridello, A., D.S. Paolino, G. Chiandussi, and M. Rossetto. 2013. “Comparison between dog-bone and Gaussian specimens for size effect evaluation in gigacycle fatigue.” Fracture and Structural Integrity 7 (26): Pages 49–56. https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.26.06.

Harvard

Tridello, A., Paolino, D., Chiandussi, G. and Rossetto, M. (2013) ‘Comparison between dog-bone and Gaussian specimens for size effect evaluation in gigacycle fatigue’, Fracture and Structural Integrity, 7(26), pp. Pages 49–56. doi: 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.26.06.

Vancouver

Tridello A, Paolino D, Chiandussi G, Rossetto M. Comparison between dog-bone and Gaussian specimens for size effect evaluation in gigacycle fatigue. Fracture and Structural Integrity. 2013;7(26):Pages 49-56. doi:10.3221/IGF-ESIS.26.06

BibTeX

@article{tridello2013, author = {Tridello, A. and Paolino, D.S. and Chiandussi, G. and Rossetto, M.}, title = {Comparison between dog-bone and Gaussian specimens for size effect evaluation in gigacycle fatigue}, journal = {Fracture and Structural Integrity}, year = {2013}, volume = {7}, number = {26}, pages = {Pages 49--56}, doi = {10.3221/IGF-ESIS.26.06}, url = {https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.26.06}, issn = {1971-8993} }

RIS

TY - JOUR AU - Tridello, A. AU - Paolino, D.S. AU - Chiandussi, G. AU - Rossetto, M. TI - Comparison between dog-bone and Gaussian specimens for size effect evaluation in gigacycle fatigue JO - Fracture and Structural Integrity T2 - Fracture and Structural Integrity PY - 2013 DA - 2013/09/25 VL - 7 IS - 26 SP - Pages 49 EP - 56 DO - 10.3221/IGF-ESIS.26.06 UR - https://doi.org/10.3221/IGF-ESIS.26.06 SN - 1971-8993 ER -

Licence

Copyright © 2014 Fracture and Structural Integrity.

Copyright 
Authors are allowed to retain both the copyright and the publishing rights of their articles without restrictions.  

Open Access Statement

Fracture and Structural Integrity (F&SI) is an open-access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the DOAI definition of open access.

F&SI operates under the Creative Commons Licence Attribution 4.0 International (CC-BY 4.0). This allows to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format, to remix, transform and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, but giving appropriate credit, providing a link to the license, and indicating if changes were made.

Similar articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)